LESSON 8.6: When Your Patient Is a Colleague
Consulting with a colleague — a practice nurse, receptionist, pharmacist, healthcare assistant, or another doctor — is a uniquely challenging situation that the SCA may test. The consultation dynamics shift fundamentally when the patient knows the system, may self-diagnose, might minimise symptoms to avoid inconvenience, or expects shortcuts. Meanwhile, you must navigate confidentiality, professional boundaries, and potential conflicts of interest — all while delivering the same standard of care you would give any other patient.
Why This Case Exists in the SCA
It is not testing an obscure scenario. Staff-as-patients is a reality in UK general practice — many practice staff are registered at their own surgery. The GMC states clearly in Good Medical Practice: "Wherever possible, avoid providing medical care to yourself or anyone with whom you have a close personal relationship." But "wherever possible" acknowledges that it is not always avoidable. When it happens, the consultation requires extra vigilance — and the SCA examiner wants to see that you understand why.
The Risks You Must Be Aware Of
- Loss of objectivity — your personal knowledge of the colleague may bias your clinical judgement, either by making you too relaxed ("Oh, it's just Sarah, she's always fine") or too anxious ("I can't miss something in a colleague")
- The colleague may withhold information — disclosing embarrassing symptoms, mental health struggles, or substance use to someone you share a tea room with is significantly harder than telling a stranger
- Expectation of shortcuts — "Can you just write me a script?" or "I don't need a full history, I know what's wrong" — they may expect you to bypass normal processes because of the relationship
- Conflict of interest — a nurse disclosing alcohol dependence creates a patient safety dilemma. A receptionist requesting a sick note for work-related stress puts you in a dual role as their doctor and their employer's colleague
- They may feel unable to challenge you — questioning your recommendation or seeking a second opinion may feel disloyal when you work together every day
Step 1: Establish the Consultation Boundary — Explicitly
Do not assume the colleague understands the boundary. Name it clearly at the start. This is not rude — it is professional, and it protects both of you.
✅ SETTING THE FRAME Doctor: "I want you to know that in this room, I'm your doctor, not your colleague. Everything we discuss is completely confidential and has absolutely no bearing on our working relationship. I want you to feel free to be completely open with me, just as you would with any other GP."
This single statement achieves four things: it separates the roles, guarantees confidentiality, gives permission for honesty, and normalises the situation.
✅ ALTERNATIVE OPENINGS
- "Before we start, I want to make sure you're comfortable seeing me about this. If you'd prefer to see a different GP — for any reason — I completely understand and I can arrange that."
- "I just want to check — are you happy to discuss this with me, or would you feel more comfortable with someone you don't work with?"
Offering the choice to see someone else demonstrates that you understand the ethical complexity. If they choose to stay, they have actively consented to the consultation — which strengthens the therapeutic relationship.
❌ WHAT NOT TO SAY
- "Since we work together, let's keep this informal — what do you need?"
- "Don't worry, I won't tell anyone. Let's just sort you out quickly."
- "Forget I'm your GP for a moment — as a colleague, here's what I think..."
Step 2: Consult Normally — No Shortcuts
This is where the SCA trap lies. The colleague-patient may say something like "You know me, doc — can you just write me a script for diazepam?" or "I just need a sick note for a couple of weeks, nothing major." The examiner is specifically testing whether you take the easy shortcut or maintain proper clinical standards.
Treat the colleague-patient exactly as you would any other patient:
- Take a proper history — do not assume they have diagnosed themselves correctly. Healthcare professionals are notoriously bad at self-diagnosing, particularly for conditions involving their own mental health
- Do not prescribe without a proper assessment — even if they tell you exactly what they want. "I know I need amoxicillin" still requires you to confirm the indication, check allergies, and assess appropriateness
- Do not issue a fit note without clinical justification — explore what is really going on, just as you would with any patient
- Explore their ideas, concerns, and expectations — they are a patient in this room, not a colleague. They deserve the same thorough, curious, patient-centred consultation
- Examine or investigate as you normally would — do not skip steps because "they'd know if something was serious"
✅ MAINTAINING STANDARDS Patient (practice nurse): "I've been getting these headaches for weeks. I'm sure it's just tension. Can you prescribe me some codeine? I've used it before and it works." Doctor: "I appreciate you telling me what's worked before — that's helpful. Before I prescribe anything, I'd like to ask you a few questions about the headaches, just as I would with any patient. I want to make sure we're not missing anything and that codeine is still the right choice for you."
⚠ COMMON PITFALL: Agreeing to a colleague's self-diagnosis and prescription request without your own assessment is not being kind — it is being clinically unsafe. If you prescribe codeine for what turns out to be temporal arteritis because you skipped the history, the fact that the patient is a nurse does not protect you.
Step 3: Maintain Clinical Objectivity
Your medical advice must be based on clinical evidence, not workplace loyalty or social dynamics. This is particularly challenging when the consultation involves a condition that could affect the colleague's ability to work safely.
The Difficult Scenario: When Health Meets Patient Safety
If a clinical staff member discloses something that could affect patient safety — alcohol dependence, drug use, significant mental health issues affecting their clinical judgement — you are in a dual position. You have a duty of care to the colleague as your patient, and a separate duty to ensure patient safety.
- Do not ignore it — address it sensitively but directly: "I want to help you with this, and I will. I also need to be honest that as a GP, I have a responsibility to consider patient safety. Let's talk about how we can manage both."
- Consider whether they need to be signposted to occupational health, the NHS Practitioner Health Programme (for doctors and dentists), or their professional regulator's health support service
- If you feel unable to remain objective — for any reason — it is appropriate and professional to suggest they see a different GP: "I want to make sure you get the best possible care. Given that we work together, would you be comfortable seeing one of my colleagues for this? I think it might allow you to speak more freely."
Step 4: Clarify What You Can and Cannot Address
Colleagues may bring workplace issues into the consultation: bullying, conflict with the practice manager, stress about workload, a grievance against another staff member. Acknowledge these — they are likely driving the health problem — but be clear about what falls within your scope as their GP and what does not.
✅ APPROPRIATE SCOPE Doctor: "I can hear that the situation at work is really affecting you, and I take that seriously. As your GP, I can help with the health impact — the anxiety, the sleep problems, the low mood. For the workplace issues themselves, I'd encourage you to speak with HR, or I can point you towards an external counsellor or the practice's employee assistance programme. Would that be helpful?"
❌ OVERSTEPPING
- "I'll have a word with the practice manager about this — don't worry."
- "Honestly, off the record, I'd just quit if I were you."
- "I totally agree — I've also had problems with that person."
The moment you start giving workplace advice, taking sides, or involving yourself in the workplace dynamic, you have crossed from doctor to colleague — and compromised both roles.
Step 5: Guide to Appropriate Resources
Part of managing the colleague-patient is knowing where to signpost them for the things you cannot handle:
- Occupational health services — for work-related health assessments and return-to-work planning
- HR department — for workplace grievances, bullying, conflict resolution
- Employee assistance programme — many practices offer this; confidential counselling and support
- NHS Practitioner Health Programme — specifically for doctors and dentists with mental health or addiction issues
- Professional body support — GMC, NMC, GPhC all have health and wellbeing support for their registrants
- External counselling — if the colleague does not feel comfortable using practice-linked services
- Trade union or BMA — for employment advice and workplace disputes
Step 6: Close with Explicit Confidentiality Reassurance
Colleagues often worry — with good reason — that their consultation will become workplace gossip. The records are on the same system that their colleagues access daily. The receptionist who booked them in knows they came. Reassure them clearly and specifically.
✅ STRONG CLOSE Doctor: "Just to confirm — everything we've discussed today is completely confidential and will not be shared with anyone at the practice, including the partners and the practice manager. Your medical record is protected, and nobody will access it in connection with your work. If you need anything further, book in exactly as you would normally."
❌ WEAK CLOSE
- "Let's keep this between us, okay? No need to make it formal."
- "Don't worry, I won't say anything" — this sounds like a personal favour rather than a professional guarantee
What If You Are Asked to Do Something Inappropriate?
If the colleague asks you to do something you would not do for any other patient — prescribe a controlled drug without justification, backdate a sick note, record something inaccurately, or provide a referral that is not clinically indicated — you must refuse. Do it kindly, but do it clearly.
✅ FIRM BUT KIND REFUSAL "I understand why you're asking, and I can see this is important to you. But I need to apply the same clinical standards I would for any patient — that's what keeps both of us safe. What I can do is [alternative]. Does that work?"
The examiner is not testing whether you can be nice to a colleague. They are testing whether you can maintain your professional integrity under social pressure.
⭐ KEY POINT: The colleague-as-patient case is fundamentally about integrity. The examiner is asking: can you separate personal and professional relationships? Can you give the same thorough, objective, boundaried care to someone you eat lunch with as to a stranger who walks through the door? Can you hold the line on clinical standards when someone you like asks you to bend them? Demonstrate this — with warmth, not coldness — and you will score well across all three domains.